Police Excessive Use of Force and the Supreme Court Supreme Court Case on Police Misconduct

Graham V. Connor 1989 Landmark case set the precedent for U.S. Supreme Court in matters relating to unethical Police decisions or immoral practices by the police (Baker & Thomas R., 2012). This paper presents discussions on how the U.S. Supreme Court analysis injustices by the police in the process of investigating or making an arrest a crime.

Case: Graham V. Connor 1989

The arrest was by a Charlotte Police department patrol officer who observed Graham enter a convenience store and exited in a suspicious manner. Graham's quick entry and exit of the convenient store was because of the long line at check-out that he could not endure owing to a need to quell a diabetic episode. The Police officer moved in to stop Graham, who was with another individual as they drove away. Heeding to the officers instructions, Graham obliged but acted erratically by running around the car and sat down just before he passed out. An officer who was responding to the backup call arrived at the scene, handcuffed Graham and put him face down on the hood of the police patrol car. Afterward, they police officer handled Graham so roughly as to cause a broken foot and other injuries as they shoved him into the backseat of a police patrol car.

The arresting officer had ignored Graham's pleas for sugar and failed to check in his wallet for a diabetic card. Follow-up investigation...

Graham filed a petition for relief at the district and circuit courts under the due process clause - Fourteenth Amendment. This petition had been shut down in all courts before the Supreme Court accepted to review his case (U.S. Department of Justice, 2012).
The accepted definition of force as given by (Baker & Thomas R., 2012) is the authority to use cohesion to overcome the intention of another. Although it is entrenched in the U.S. Civil Rights that police officers have the legal authority to use appropriate measures including force to protect themselves, apprehend alleged criminals, diffuse situation and protect others and themselves, excessive or inappropriate use of this force is cautioned against. For a plaintiff, it is challenging to accuse a police officer for excessive use of force since they are protected by the immunity clause. This immunity clause is however not absolute only allowing the officers to undertake their duties with due diligence with no fear for reprisal. The U.S. Supreme Court takes up cases relating to police injustice and police misconduct upholding that the officer ought to be afforded a benefit of the doubt that their actions were lawful and in line with their duty obligations.

Guided by the definition of excessive use of force as the force that is greater than the needful measure to oblige compliance to an unwilling or willing…